Blog news

Graphique : les Etats-Unis à la veille de la saison des fêtes 2020.

Cette journée mondiale de la Poste 2020 marque un tournant dans l’histoire postale. En effet, elle s’inscrit à seulement quatre jours du lancement de la saison des fêtes pour les e-marchands du monde entier qui commercialisent aujourd’hui leurs produits sur des plateformes mondiales de commerce électronique aussi diverses qu’Amazon, Etsy, Ebay, ou encore Jumia. Les consommateurs sont prêts à entamer leurs achats de Noël et de fin d’année plus de deux mois avant de remettre leurs cadeaux à leurs proches, alors que la plupart s’y prenaient deux semaines à l’avance il y a encore quelques années. Bienvenu à la nouvelle normalité du commerce électronique qui impacte à son tour tout le secteur postal et de la livraison !

Ce tournant dans l’histoire postale résulte bien évidemment de la pandémie et du grand confinement qui a bouleversé les modes de vie et de consommation de milliards de personnes dans le monde. Télétravail, achats et autres services en ligne : le digital est en croissance explosive depuis quelques mois et nous nous retrouvons aujourd’hui plus près des projections qui avaient été réalisées pour le monde numérique en 2030 que celles qui avaient été prédites pour l’année 2020 en cours. Les services postaux en subissent les conséquences de plein fouet : effondrement des volumes de courrier déjà en déclin depuis plus d’une décennie, et très fortes hausses du trafic des petits paquets et colis, parfois atteignant même des croissances à trois chiffres dans certains pays et certains mois de l’année.

Le secteur postal vient de commencer à nous apporter le futur. C’est un véritable condensé de ce que nous allons continuer à vivre au cours des prochaines années : les consommateurs, les citoyens et les entreprises ont définitivement abandonné l’ère analogique en cette année zéro, soit notre année 2020, et ont été précipités dans l’ère numérique de gré ou de force pour affronter l’ennemi commun, le Coronavirus. Or, il ne s’agit pas de se tromper d’ennemi pour le secteur postal. Le défi sectoriel le plus important n’est pas, paradoxalement, le Coronavirus et ses effets sur l’évolution du trafic de la poste aux lettres ou des colis postaux. L’ennemi postal, beaucoup plus insidieux et difficile de combattre, c’est l’état d’esprit du secteur pour les réformes à venir ; c’est le frein à l’accélération de la transformation des modèles d’affaires dans les entreprises postales et de logistique ; c’est le manque de soutien aux innovateurs au sein de ces institutions bien souvent myopes sur ce qui les attend demain ; c’est la crainte de s’unir et de collaborer plus ardemment que jamais avec les autres acteurs du secteur alors que ce pari pourrait s’avérer gagnant-gagnant pour tous. Alors, les acteurs du secteur tendent à avoir recours aux vieilles ficelles pour affronter l’hyper-demande pour les services postaux et de livraison de colis ; c’est l’introduction de nouvelles taxes additionnelles sur les flux de la saison des fêtes comme aux Etats-Unis ou ailleurs aussi ; c’est aussi l’introduction de quotas de livraisons par client pour éluder les limites de capacité des infrastructures de chaque entreprise de livraison prise séparément ; ou c’est simplement l’interruption de services pour les très petites entreprises qui vendent en ligne, comme l’a déjà fait Amazon.

Dans cette nouvelle normalité postale et logistique, il n’y a aucun doute pour un rôle proactif de la régulation et du régulateur postal. Il ne s’agit pas de se contenter de la nouvelle normalité, mais d’accélérer aussi vite que possible la transformation de celle-ci en une meilleure normalité en agissant de concert avec tous les acteurs et parties prenantes du secteur. A l’instar de notre passage définitif à l’ère numérique, un autre bond vers une nouvelle régulation postale s’impose désormais. Rappelons-nous que l’ami postal a été à nos côtés pour nous amener soins, prospérité et résilience pendant la grande pandémie. Nous souhaitons le garder près de nous, en pleine santé et orienté vers l’avenir.

Bonne journée mondiale de la Poste en ce 9 octobre, et mes meilleurs vœux de réussite dans vos entreprises de développement postal.

 

Dr. José Anson, Fondateur et CEO de UPIDO, et économiste postal.

Closely monitoring the impact of Coronavirus on online shopping behaviour. In many countries, Covid-19 could well be the greatest accelerator of e-commerce ever. This will challenge postal and logistics companies as never before, particularly in view of this end of the year holiday season. Who is going to deal with the much higher than expected increase in parcels volumes? How would large urban centers and megacities cope with less people in public transportation but more delivery vans on the roads should people shift from public to private means of transportation once back in office? And probably many other open questions that could dramatically reshape today’s shoppers’ experiences.

The postal and logistics industry and the on-going fourth industrial revolution will soon collide. The logistics Internet is still the missing element of this revolution, and logistics will not only become the new sexy, but it will also totally reshape the way we consume and exchange in the next decade. One certainty: today’s postal and logistics business models will die. And with them, its pricing models as well!

There is no better case to illustrate the future postal and logistics pricing shift than the one of Universal Postal Union’s terminal dues and remuneration systems. For many years ignored by the public, they suddenly became more familiar as a result of the recent international postal crisis between the United States and the rest of the world. At the heart of this crisis, one can find economic distortions created by an unsustainable pricing of international postal exchanges built for the past glorious era of international letter-post.

My purpose with this series of mini-articles on the topic is to try to open a constructive postal dialogue on the future of global postal pricing in the era of global e-commerce. All players could contribute to build a better system together if they were able to start from a fresh perspective on these issues. There is no doubt in my mind that the Universal Postal Union is called and must play a critical role on these topics: it can deliver a much better international postal pricing environment. I am also conscious, after having served as UPU IB assistant secretary during numerous terminal dues governance meetings, of the implementation difficulties entailed by the potential changes I will introduce in the forthcoming articles. However, maintaining the currently scheduled evolutions of UPU’s remuneration systems will certainly not lead to less difficulties and challenges in the years to come. So let us try, together and not against each other, to steer changes in the right direction at least!

I also believe that, given the number and variety of players involved in these issues, a transparent and open debate on the future of pricing models of postal and logistics services is most welcome. This is why I reiterate my invitation to question, challenge, criticise and propose alternatives to the new global postal pricing ideas I will expose! It will start in the next mini-article, so feel free to post your reactions and comments!

PS: I experiment with a very-short-article writing format given the current readers’ preferences on LinkedIn.

In my previous article, I was introducing the notion of smart investment contracts for development in order to spur much needed funding for critical postal and delivery infrastructure projects all over the world. One of the key advantages of blockchain technologies is to accelerate and smooth complex processes that were usually requiring a trusted third-party, typically reducing weeks or month-long treatments until settlement to just a few days and even a matter of hours. Hence one of the main features of a blockchain is to be “trustless”. This confusing terminology simply means that, with blockchain technologies, the trusted third-party is not required anymore. A fragile centralized trusted third-party mechanism can be replaced by many decentralized copies of the same ledger in hands of all parties involved in the transaction. Most importantly, none of these parties can change past records of this decentralized ledger: they are simply immutable.The postal and delivery infrastructure needs to speed up access to critical funding, that is often either postponed or never made available once handled in the classical development funding paradigm, diversify and widen its sources of funding and mobilize huge amounts of investments that can enable its sustainable digital transformation. In order to achieve these objectives, and given the multiple stakeholders involved in today’s postal and delivery infrastructure development plans, only a massive adoption of blockchain can lead to unlock massive amounts of capital.So how would postal development be funded through a blockchain? Postal and delivery infrastructure investors, be they big players such as Alibaba or small e-tailers, would receive tokens for their investment. These tokens would have a hybrid function not only allowing access to capital but also to postal and delivery services in a future. Indeed, these postal and delivery tokens could be converted in a quantity of delivery services transactions, at a conversion rate pegged to the evolutions of quality of service on the delivery market. Typically, this conversion rate mechanism would lead to more units of local currency per token, the higher the quality of service, or individualization of delivery convenience, provided to the recipients of e-commerce items.

Instead of traditional stamps or postage, customers could pay in convertible tokens the value of which would be directly linked to the quality of postal service.

In such a framework, tremendous incentives for Quality of Service and Delivery Convenience Improvements would be created for postal and delivery companies. At the same time, given that quality of service and delivery convenience will reach an upper limit one day, the value of postal and delivery coins (or tokens) will tend to stabilize naturally (thus avoiding speculative bubbles that backfire on the very merits of the blockchain technology itself).The smart development contract through a blockchain would also ensure that multi-sided issues, typical in complex postal supply chains, are prioritised and funded. All relevant organizations and institutions called to deal with a specific problem resolution would be jointly funded to achieve a common goal, and as a result, this would consistently increase the odds of successful development project outcomes. It would also perfectly deal with the current weaknesses in many postal investment frameworks, such as the UPU Quality of Service Fund (QSF).Indeed, a first weakness in such an investment scheme was to believe that quality of service was one-sided, or more specifically, that relying on one side of the receiving network, multi-sided issues, so typical in complex postal supply chains, could be resolved. Postal networks were then stuck in a chicken-and-egg problem since the low quality of service in destination countries were not triggering enough traffic so that they could receive higher development funding, itself dependent on higher mail volumes. By leaving destination posts alone in managing multi-sided issues, the risk of not successfully increasing quality of service were multiplied.Funding both the Post and its related partners when trying to solve a quality-of-service issue would have certainly produced better results than funding one side of the solution only. The UPU would have been required to build truly transversal projects that would have systematically connected its quality of service goals to other relevant issues, or enablers of success. This would have certainly increased the odds of successful postal and delivery infrastructure development. However, could the different parties have trusted each other in such a collaborative investment framework? To be fair with the UPU QSF founders, there was no such technology as blockchain when it was created that would have fostered instantaneous trust between partners. Everything would have been depending on complex check-and-balances and controls between different institutions with a de jure strong yet de facto weak centralized component for projects monitoring.

Now a blockchain-driven investment mechanism can revolutionize the governance of funding postal and delivery infrastructure development projects, and rebuild trust for huge investment in this field.

Are postal and delivery infrastructure stakeholders ready for it? We’ll keep you posted.

Postal networks in many developing economies are desperately looking for sources of funding a much-needed development catch-up in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Governments often either lack the necessary means or the willingness to invest in the postal and delivery companies of their country. More advanced postal enterprises, who are funding international postal development through the UPU’s Quality of Service Fund, are also more and more limited and financially constrained for funding postal development. They have become increasingly reluctant to pay for the development of other networks after decades of disappointments and lack of concrete results in many partner countries. The traditional postal infrastructure is not far from being in shambles in too many least developed countries. The fourth industrial revolution will only widen the postal and delivery infrastructure gaps between countries should the situation continue in this way.

Yet the greatest untapped potential is exactly there, in the so many disconnected and dysfunctional postal and delivery areas of the world. Today less than a billion people benefit from some relatively decent postal and delivery service. Traditional posts have rather been on a path to universalizing a lack of relevance of their delivery services, with mounting complaints from recipients of goods ordered online. So, who is going to be willing to invest in a radical transformation of the postal and delivery infrastructure in order to fund the highly transversal and collaborative projects I was highlighting in my previous article? Who are and where are the funders of the next generation of postal and logistics networks? Who would be ready to substitute or complement the few traditional funders of postal development?

A lot of answers to these questions are related to trust: the trust that too many postal entities cannot benefit from potential external funders today, or the too many uncertainties in funding sometimes rotten postal institutions and systems. How could we best overcome this challenge and give a fair chance to the postal and delivery companies really willing to be part of the fourth industrial revolution? Let us build a trusted and collaborative funding mechanism and connect them to it. But what’s this trusted and collaborative funding mechanism?

For a given postal or delivery company, it is about starting to be co-funded with one, two or more partners or even rival networks, instead of being the single beneficiary of the investment. The outside partners, being co-funded for systemic collaborative development, could also be any relevant small or big enterprise, start-up or platform, including more or less direct competitors that could potentially contribute and benefit from a joint common investment in global postal and logistics supply chains. The trusted and collaborative funding mechanism would also introduce an innovative dynamic incentive-based mechanism whereby a player could be removed from the “funded chain”, and substituted by another, if critical milestones are not explicitly achieved across the different stages of funding. This is simply called a smart investment contract for development. It would be one for a comprehensive and collaborative postal and delivery infrastructure development worldwide. Good news! It could be easily operated thanks to the recent progresses in blockchain technologies.

Let me deal with more details about this revolutionary postal and delivery infrastructure development mechanism in my next article!

As highlighted in UPU’s Postal Development Report, postal services are confronted to an unprecedented relevance crisis in spite of being one of the most globally connected and resilient infrastructures in the world. E-commerce couldn’t thrive without them and all of the Amazons and Alibabas would not be able to make their fortune. Warren Buffet once said that what Jeff Bezos did with Amazon was a miracle, but the true miracle was delivering billions and billions of online orders to nearly each corner of the connected planet (another half of it still remains unconnected though) over the last two decades or so, and that would not have been possible without the postal service. What would have become of these platforms without an infrastructure capable of delivering to each and every home? However, while no one doubts about the extreme relevance of Amazon, Alibaba or Ebay today, the same is not true for postal services.

The biggest relevance challenge, we believe, is that too many postal industry leaders are focused on the wrong transformational issues. Mail volumes declines are keeping them busy with cost reductions programmes, or diversification strategies throughout a number of postal activities, including financial services. As for the e-commerce boom, perceived as a tremendous opportunity for delivering a record number of packages year after year, it constitutes postal leaders’ main hopes and vision of the future of the industry. Postal and logistics services are not just exposed to direct competitive pressure by e-commerce platforms’ own delivery systems, but are, as well, remaining very far from these companies in modern consumers’ perception scale and are often the ones being blamed in case of terrible delivery experiences. Unfortunately, trust in some postal services has gone a long time ago and their relevance is at stake as never before.

The postal industry must come back to the basic and most fundamental questions regarding its very existence and relevance in the 21st century and avoid prioritizing other issues until the heart of the business is not reshaped. Luckily, history is here to teach us a few key significant lessons.

The first fundamental shift and dramatic transformation of the Post dates back to 15th century and the Renaissance era. The Thurn and Taxis family and its relatives were operating a pure transportation enterprise until they realized it was great for their business to pivot it towards servicing the Royals of Europe, speeding communication and enabling news and messages to circulate from one end to another at a time of raising European cultural awareness following the invention of the printing press. In these circumstances, instead of just being another transportation business, they started delivering a service, as never provided before. Their key move was designing an exclusive messaging delivery service customized to the needs of the sovereign.

In the UK, in 1840, this first critical postal development stage was revolutionized by Rowland Hill, through the introduction of stamps. Affordable posting tariffs that were prepaid by the sender only (before the introduction of the “penny black” stamp, recipients had to pay, on top of the senders, for their mail to be delivered) shifted delivery service, provided to a few wealthy ones, to one with a much broader use and increasingly accessible to the general population. Literacy was being broadened to wider segments of society through the different waves of industrial and political revolutions. In these circumstances, Hill’s postal revolution brought the fundamental notion of universalizing postal delivery.

Postal services were truly globalized and connected thanks to Heinrich von Stephan and Montgomery Blair and the creation of the Universal Postal Union in 1874. Coordination of all postal services operating in the world through a single postal territory supported the first wave of globalization of the end of the 19th century. The conditions for global delivery were set for the first time.

Almost another century was needed for postal services to be challenged and transformed. The development of express services, under the influence of pioneers’ such as Fred Smith, introduced the fastest delivery services ever supplied in human history. Those were made available thanks to great advances in air transportation in the 20th century at a time of accelerated development of the service economy and surge in global trade. Speed of postal services would be changed forever while tracking was progressively introduced and generalized throughout most logistics and postal networks…

… and then the world wide web came but the Posts didn’t fundamentally revisit their role. More than two decades after and they still mostly operate according to outdated delivery standards set before the Internet and e-commerce era. The relevance crisis has unfolded. An increasing development gap has appeared between the evolution of the general economy and the one of most postal companies in the world (see UPU’s figure below).

At UPIdo we clearly support a postal revolution as a way to regain relevance and trust for postal services in the 21st century. Technology can support this radical sector transformation today but a deep mindset change is needed among industry players.

Current postal value propositions must be totally revisited. Delivery, the starting point for any postal revolution in the past, should be at the very centre of next postal transformation, too. Neither diversification into other postal business lines nor cost reduction programmes in face of mail volume declines nor defining new categories of postal shipments for e-commerce can be the central issue. All main postal transformations in the past started with radical changes to the core, namely delivery conditions.

Delivery is one of the very key components of the value, or utility, of online ordering for e-shoppers and e-sellers today. People buy just so much more than a product or good online… they buy an overall convenience experience enabling them to access the greatest variety of products in the most seamless way ever. This calls for the greatest customization of delivery services ever. And this is where a first wall may be hit for an industry used to deliver in highly standardized ways, to be regulated according to common national or international delivery standards, and that has so far fail to understand the very uniqueness of each and every of its current and future customers in the era of big data and AI. Postal services are very far away from the notion of full customization of delivery services from first-to-last mile.

Yet delivery can only be radically reshaped by gaining a deep understanding of the uniqueness of postal customers, of the uniqueness of their life style and living conditions that cannot be properly integrated into today’s ultra-standardized ways of delivering e-commerce.

This is why the engineering of delivery must totally shift from being driven by a pure operational optimization process in response to operational costs to matching the greatest convenience expectations of customers instead.

Maximum delivery convenience would lead to maximum value in terms of business growth, sales and development for e-tailers and e-commerce platforms. However, these main partners of the postal and logistics industry, the Amazon, Alibaba and Ebays of this world, must also understand that the value experienced by its customers, thanks to highly customized postal services, is such a critical dimension of their business which in turn calls for postal and logistics companies to be genuinely rewarded, unlike today, for their success and failures in bringing this unique experience to customers.

In terms of pricing, this would mean that the providers of an increasingly tailored delivery convenience, namely the postal and logistics companies, must be paid according to the level of customized delivery experience they bring and its direct performance impacts on sales and revenues growth of e-tailers and platforms. Postal pricing cannot just remain as it is today, a simple delivery charge for a commoditized delivery service failing to recognize postal services key role in acquiring new e-shoppers and expanding the business of e-commerce platforms. Moreover, the current pricing practices around e-commerce delivery shipments, particularly at the international level, do not ensure the sustainability of delivery enterprises as long as they cannot more fully participate in the successful value creation generated by e-tailers and e-commerce platforms thanks to their vast delivery networks.

Therefore, postal and logistics companies must aim at maximizing customized delivery convenience and e-tailers and platforms should reward them for the huge impact this new shift in postal paradigm can have on their own business development. The greater the latest e-commerce business development impact, and the higher the price these platforms should pay to their postal and logistics partners. Because large platforms are those potentially benefiting the most from maximum “tailorization” and convenience of delivery services, they should also support most of the price burden. Pricing should be moved away from price per item to price per addressee benefiting from customized delivery conditions. Postal services could even become totally free below a certain number (for instance 1000) of addressees by sender per year. This would simply mean that most of the people would stop paying for sending items through postal services and benefit from increasingly tailored delivery service of their online orders. The core postal revenue generation would be driven by supplying the greatest delivery convenience and customization ever in postal history in a fair deal with large e-commerce platforms and senders. Once the core delivery would be reshaped, other strategic choices could follow, including the role of postal services and networks in areas such as payments or financial services. Without a clearly defined core delivery business, diversification is most likely to be unsustainable, lack of relevance and eventually fail.

The lessons from postal history support these relevant moves. By reshaping their basic transportation business, the Thurn and Taxis understood the critical importance of developing a service which was customized for the Empire: the modern Post was born. Today billions of postal customers are waiting for the greatest delivery convenience and customization truly matching the way they live, buy and exchange online. Rowland Hill introduced a postal pricing revolution to expand the use of these services in 1840. Today e-commerce platforms must be charged according to the impact of maximum delivery convenience on their successful business development and postal services stop being “commoditized”. Billing per addressee or per address, according to the level of delivery convenience provided, should be considered and replace the current tariff per shipment. Under a certain number of addressees per sender and per year, postal services should become free. The creation of the UPU also tells us a lot. It set up the conditions of global delivery through a single postal territory during the first wave of globalization of the 19th century. Today no distinction should be operated between national or international postal customers: there are only global postal customers. Segmenting national and international postal services is irrelevant in the age of social networks where people are irreversibly bound across borders by trade and ideas. Would a social network divide international and national users? Finally, after express services sped up delivery over the course of the 20th century, the age of predictability of delivery (knowing what will be delivered when) will give a sense of ever faster delivery services and save billions and billions of waiting hours to senders and recipients alike, virtually matching the instantaneous gratification feeling of buying in a physical store.

To achieve these new postal relevance goals, the right strategic mindset is necessary. This is no evolution: it is a revolution. But the key drivers of this revolution are not technological. Big data is not the revolution for the Post. Artificial Intelligence is not the revolution for the Post. Blockchain is not the revolution for the Post. The Internet of Things is not the revolution for the Post. Drones or robots are not the revolution. The revolution is in a new mindset for the industry. What makes the world a better place are changes of mindsets. UPIdo and other highly relevant technologies are there to fully support them.

Ref. and graphic: http://www.upu.int/uploads/tx_sbdownloader/postalDevelopmentReport2018En.pdf

Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are still controversial. Some perceive them as purely speculative instruments able to feed financial bubbles that will eventually burst and leave many people in tears and companies in shambles. However, those are only special cases of a blockchain, a technology that will soon (if not already) benefit from a consensus regarding its disruption power that will reshape entire industries and their underpinning economic models.

In the area of logistics and trade, it is increasingly clear that any tracking system will be blockchain-driven in the coming decade.

 

In the area of logistics and trade, it is increasingly clear that any tracking system will be blockchain-driven in the coming decade. This applies to tracking used in the freight industry to B2C e-commerce delivered at home. A number of blockchain-driven tracking solutions are progressively appearing yet this is just the beginning. Tracking, as it was built in the past, suffers from a major drawback: the lack of a single source of truth in a world of increasingly complex supply chains.

While millions of e-shoppers have already been complaining about delivery failure issues, tracking can barely provide an answer to the following question: who was responsible for my delivery problem? It’s not uncommon for e-shoppers to get contradictory answers from e-tailers or platforms on the one hand, and postal and logistics companies on the other hand, without even mentioning a possible involvement of customs authorities. All in all, it’s very difficult, if not impossible today, to have a true visibility on the party (or the parties) that truly failed in handling an online order delivery. As a result, the very trust in the e-commerce ecosystem is being undermined.

The current visibility provided by today’s tracking solutions does not shed any light on the reasons for failed or delayed deliveries. E-shoppers must guess what is going on at best. There is no immutable records on “who did what” between the time of online purchase and final delivery. Every party, form e-sellers providing their products to platforms who are then contracting postal and logistics providers, has different views of what is actually happening with an e-shopper’s order. There is no single source of truth that will facilitate communication with e-shoppers and between the different companies and networks involved in a transaction.

A solution from the past would have consisted in trying to create a trusted third party able to gather data and information about an online order from purchase to delivery and made sure that critical data was then shared in a secured and safe way between all the abovementioned stakeholders. Unfortunately, a consensus on the way to proceed and unite the different parties to an e-commerce transaction was never achieved. And this trusted third party does not exist as of today.

With blockchain technologies, the creation of centralized trusted third party is not required anymore.

 

With blockchain technologies, the creation of this centralized trusted third party is not required anymore. By construction, blockchain technologies can enable that each participant in such a system (or node in the business network) benefit from an immutable copy of what truly happened to an online order from purchase to delivery. As a result, there is no single source of system failure given that the sales and tracking records are decentralized and available on multiple machines simultaneously. In these conditions, all parties could safely benefit from a single source of truth whenever a dispute would be open between them. E-shoppers could further trust delivery providers, e-sellers and platforms and get consistent customer service answers from one or the other. The single source of truth would become the single source of trust in an ever-thriving e-commerce ecosystem.

As Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica major private data leak has clearly demonstrated, waiting to deal with customers’ issues until the very time they strike back is risky and highly counterproductive. Never wait until customers are disappointed: customer service and care must start way before people are unsatisfied with their experience. This is also true for online shopping and their delivery to customers’ doors or parcel lockers.

“DM us please” has become a recurring post-delivery failure mantra on main e-tailers’ and carriers’ social network accounts. Angry customers are posting their dissatisfaction with delivery experiences every day and online sellers are genuinely trying hard to establish a dialogue with these customers and handle their cases in the best possible manner ex post.

Yet dealing with disappointed customers, particularly after the delivery failed, is not only costly in the short run in terms of customer service but also in the medium and long run in terms of reputation and trust. While e-commerce transactions are growing at a double-digit rate thanks to ever more attractive online shopping platforms with millions of products and deals at a single click of more than two billion e-shoppers today, mishandling the delivery experience can jeopardize future business growth. This can both result in lower average shopping purchase values or conversion rates, both being key metrics of successful e-commerce development.

So why are bad delivery experiences mostly handled once the problems with the parcel appear?

 

At UPIdo, we believe this is closely related to the way tracking solutions are provided by carriers to e-shoppers and e-tailers. Tracking systems have been established to provide customers with end-to-end visibility of what already happened, or put in other words, are focused on providing visibility to both e-shoppers and e-sellers on the past rather than on the future. Today any e-shopper can increasingly “benefit” from a myriad of operational details on how her parcel is moving across the complexities of postal supply chains and logistics’ networks. However, she has no visibility on the likelihood of a delivery failure or delay. She is simply left with posting her disappointment on social networks, an angry call to customer service or just giving up future purchases. This is not what we can call a satisfactory state neither for e-shoppers nor carriers and even less for e-tailers.

A decisive step towards solving this problem is to continuously assess the probability of a final delivery failure or delay along the tracking events sequence. UPIdo’s tracking with artificial intelligence is designed with this very purpose.

It can scan and analyse any sequence of on-going tracking events and dynamically inform about what customers and parcels are most likely to be confronted to a delivery failure in real-time conditions. This means that both e-sellers and carriers can map and anticipate where the delivery problems will arise before they actually happen. They can better manage this risk. And, critically, this also means that the customer service can now become proactive, anticipate a conversation with unsatisfied customers instead of simply being left to angry voices.

In conclusion, at UPIdo, we believe tracking solutions must be shifted towards anticipative visibility focused on predicting what delivery transactions will fail before delivery failures actually happen, instead of only providing a picture of what already happened in a parcel’s complex journey towards the e-shopper.

In conclusion, at UPIdo, we believe tracking solutions must be shifted towards anticipative visibility focused on predicting what delivery transactions will fail before delivery failures actually happen, instead of only providing a picture of what already happened in a parcel’s complex journey towards the e-shopper. UPIdo’s artificial intelligence empowers e-shoppers, e-sellers and carriers with end-to-end predictability of failures along any tracked delivery process. By so-doing, dealing with delivery problems before customers start complaining becomes possible and a new harmony between all parts in any e-commerce transaction can be established. E-shoppers, e-sellers and carriers can achieve peace-of-mind together.

Please email us if you are interested in testing and applying UPIdo’s delivery failure tracking with artificial intelligence.